Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithm and Feature Selection on Student Grade Small Datasets

Authors

  • Agus Wantoro Aisyah University Author
  • Nur Aminudin Aisyah University Author
  • Dita Septasari Aisyah University Author
  • Ningsiah Ningsiah Aisyah University Author
  • Ikna Awaliyani Aisyah University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31571/ijcmasted.v1i1.1010

Keywords:

Comparative, Machine Learning, Feature Selection, Small Dataset, Student

Abstract

Assessment of student academic performance is an important aspect in improving the quality of the learning process in higher education. With the development of Machine Learning (ML) techniques, predictive analysis of student assessment data can be carried out more accurately and efficiently. This research aims to analyze the comparative performance of several ML algorithms and evaluate the effectiveness of various feature selection techniques on student assessment datasets. The dataset used is a limited dataset that contains attributes that represent components of student academic assessment. The research process includes determining cross-validation, applying ML algorithms, applying feature selection techniques, and performance evaluation. The ML algorithms compared are Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Tree, Random Forest, and AdaBoost. Several feature selection techniques used are Information Gain (IG), Gain Ratio (GR), Gini Dicrease (GD), ReliefF. Evaluation of the performance of the ML algorithm uses the Confusion Matrix in the form of accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score, while the performance evaluation of the feature selection technique uses Spearman Correlation. Experimental results show that the SVM algorithm shows the best performance followed by k-NN. However, based on computing time testing, the Tree algorithm shows the fastest time. Apart from that, the comparison results of feature selection techniques show that Gini Decrease has the best correlation. The findings of this research contribute to selecting a more effective educational data analysis method and can be a reference for developing ML algorithms in student academic evaluation

Author Biographies

  • Dita Septasari, Aisyah University

    Information Technology Education

  • Ningsiah Ningsiah, Aisyah University

    Faculty of Health

  • Ikna Awaliyani, Aisyah University

    Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

References

Bashir, S., Khan, Z. S., Khan, F. H., Anjum, A., & Bashir, K. (2019). Improving Heart Disease Prediction Using Feature Selection Approaches. 2019 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST), 619–623. https://doi.org/10.1109/IBCAST.2019.8667106

Boateng, E. Y., Otoo, J., & Abaye, D. A. (2020). Basic Tenets of Classification Algorithms K -Nearest-Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and Neural Network : A Review. Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, 8(1), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.2020.84020

Casteren, W. Van. (2017). The Waterfall Model And The Agile Methodologies : A Comparison By Project Characteristics-Short The Waterfall Model and Agile Methodologies. Academic Competences in the Bachelor, February, 10–13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313768860

Jia, K., Yang, Z., Zheng, L., Zhu, Z., & Bi, T. (2021). Spearman Correlation-Based Pilot Protection for Transmission Line Connected to PMSGs and DFIGs. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(7), 4532–4544. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3018499

Korkmaz, C., & Correia, A.-P. (2019). A review of research on machine learning in educational technology. Educational Media International, 56(3), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1669875

Ohsaki, M., Wang, P., Matsuda, K., Katagiri, S., Watanabe, H., & Ralescu, A. (2017). Confusion-matrix-based kernel logistic regression for imbalanced data classification. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(9), 1806–1819. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2017.2682249

Popchev, I., & Orozova, D. (2023). Algorithms for Machine Learning with Orange System. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 19(4), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i04.36897

Sorensen, Lucy C. (2019). “Big Data” in Educational Administration: An Application for Predicting School Dropout Risk. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(3), 404–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18799439

Sulistiani, H., Syarif, A., Muludi, K., & Warsito. (2024). Performance evaluation of feature selections on some ML approaches for diagnosing the narcissistic personality disorder. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 13(2), 1383–1391. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i2.6717

Wang, J., Zhou, S., Yi, Y., & Kong, J. (2014). An improved feature selection based on effective range for classification. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/972125

Yan, T., Shen, S.-L., Zhou, A., & Chen, X. (2022). Prediction of geological characteristics from shield operational parameters by integrating grid search and K-fold cross validation into stacking classification algorithm. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14(4), 1292–1303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.03.002

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Innovative and Inclusive Collaborative Approaches to Address Global Challenges in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education

How to Cite

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithm and Feature Selection on Student Grade Small Datasets. (2026). Proceeding of IJC-MaSTEd (International Joint Conference on Mathematics, Science, Technology, and Education), 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.31571/ijcmasted.v1i1.1010