Analysis of Interaction Patterns in Augmented Reality-Based Physics Learning

Authors

  • Nurussaniah Nurussaniah Universitas PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia Author
  • Maurish Sofie Rahmi Batita University of Brawijiya, Indonesia Author
  • Nindya Juwita Utimadini University of Surrey, United Kingdom Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31571/ijcmasted.v1i1.1073

Keywords:

Augmented reality, Interaction patterns, Physics education

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) has been increasingly integrated into physics education, providing an immersive and interactive learning experience. While numerous studies have examined AR’s impact on conceptual understanding, engagement, and motivation, limited research has explored the dynamic interaction patterns that emerge when AR is used over multiple learning sessions. This study investigates the evolving interaction patterns among students, teachers, and AR technology in a physics learning environment. Specifically, it examines how student-student, student-teacher, and student-AR interactions change across six AR-enhanced learning sessions on magnetism. A qualitative research approach was employed, involving 36 high school students from West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Data were collected through video-recorded classroom observations, interaction mapping, and field notes. Interaction frequency analysis and qualitative coding were applied to assess engagement trends and learning strategies over time. The findings indicate that student-student interactions fluctuated, with a noticeable decrease in session three, followed by a recovery in later sessions. Student-teacher interactions increased progressively, suggesting a growing reliance on teacher guidance as learning tasks became more complex. Meanwhile, student-AR interactions remained relatively stable, with peaks at the beginning and end of each session, indicating initial exploration and final knowledge validation phases. This study highlights the temporal dynamics of collaborative learning in AR-supported environments, emphasizing the need for strategic integration of AR and teacher scaffolding. The results provide valuable insights for designing more effective AR-based instructional strategies that sustain meaningful student engagement over multiple sessions.

Author Biographies

  • Nurussaniah Nurussaniah, Universitas PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia

    Physics Education Study Program

  • Maurish Sofie Rahmi Batita, University of Brawijiya, Indonesia

    Information Technology Education Study Program

  • Nindya Juwita Utimadini, University of Surrey, United Kingdom

    Surrey Institute of Education

References

Acosta, J. L. B., Navarro, S. M. B., Gesa, R. F., & Kinshuk, K. (2019). Framework for designing motivational augmented reality applications in vocational education and training. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4182

Arymbekov, B., Turekhanova, K., & Turdalyuly, M. (2024). The effect of augmented reality (AR) supported teaching activities on academic success and motivation to learn nuclear physics among high school pupils. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(5), 743–760. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.5.2099

Ashraf, M. A., Mollah, S., Perveen, S., Shabnam, N., & Nahar, L. (2022). Pedagogical applications, prospects, and challenges of blended learning in Chinese higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772322

Bakri, F., & Dwijayanti, D. (2022). Physics textbook enriched with videos based on augmented reality technology: Practice in problem solving skill in dynamics of rotation concept for senior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2377(1), 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012079

Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). A case study of immersive virtual field trips in an elementary classroom: Students’ learning experience and teacher–student interaction behaviors. Computers & Education, 140, 103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103600

Diegmann, P., Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., van den Eynden, S., & Basten, D. (2015). Benefits of augmented reality in educational environments: A systematic literature review. In Wirtschaftsinformatik proceedings 2015. https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2015/103

Doyle, C., & Nagle, T. (2019). A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of technology enabled collaborative learning. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6hq5j

Ganesan, M., & Kumar, B. D. (2024). Augmented reality: The key to unlock customer engagement potential. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 42(6), 976–1009. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2023-0408

Harahap, F., Nasution, N. E. A., & Manurung, B. (2019). The effect of blended learning on students’ learning achievement and science process skills in plant tissue culture course. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 521–538.

Hou, H.-T., & Keng, S.-H. (2021). A dual-scaffolding framework integrating peer-scaffolding and cognitive-scaffolding for an augmented reality-based educational board game: An analysis of learners’ collective flow state and collaborative learning behavioral patterns. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969409

Hunuk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2023). Exploring the co-construction of an action research experience between a teacher educator and pre-service teachers. European Physical Education Review, 29(1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X221126377

Jdaitawi, M., Kan’an, A., Rabab’h, B., Alsharoa, A., Johari, M., Alashkar, W., Elkilany, A., & Abas, A. (2022). The importance of augmented reality technology in science education: A scoping review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(9), 956–963. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.9.1706

Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., & Viiri, J. (2018). Visualising the temporal aspects of collaborative inquiry-based learning processes in technology-enhanced physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 40(14), 1697–1717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1506594

Li, S., Jiao, X., Cai, S., & Shen, Y. (2024). Enhancing AR-based learning environments for STEM education: A design-based study on design features, kinematics learning, and mathematics self-efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13528

Lin, H.-Y., & Tsai, S.-C. (2021). Student perceptions towards the usage of AR-supported STEMUP application in mobile courses development and its implementation into English learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6125

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M. D., & Mora, C. E. (2015). Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093

Mokmin, N. A. M., Hanjun, S., Jing, C., & Qi, S. (2024). Impact of an AR-based learning approach on the learning achievement, motivation, and cognitive load of students on a design course. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00270-2

Nikimaleki, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Effects of a collaborative AR-enhanced learning environment on learning gains and technology implementation beliefs: Evidence from a graduate teacher training course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(3), 758–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12646

Nusroh, H., Khalif, M. A., & Saputri, A. A. (2022). Developing physics learning media based on augmented reality to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Physics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2022.4.1.10912

O’Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (Eds.). (2014). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603715

Petrov, P. D., & Atanasova, T. V. (2020). The effect of augmented reality on students’ learning performance in STEM education. Information, 11(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11040209

Schoor, C., Narciss, S., & Körndle, H. (2015). Regulation during cooperative and collaborative learning: A theory-based review of terms and concepts. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1038540

Tan, T. L., Nguyen, H. T. T., Khanh, N. C. N., Le, T. H. T., & Vo, U. T. H. (2024). Researching influences of learner experience on AR/VR adoption: The case of Vietnamese universities. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, 007.

Wang, Y. (2022). Effects of augmented reality game-based learning on students’ engagement. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 12(3), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2072015

Yücel, Ü. A., & Usluel, Y. K. (2016). Knowledge building and the quantity, content, and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 97, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.015

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Innovative and Inclusive Collaborative Approaches to Address Global Challenges in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education

How to Cite

Analysis of Interaction Patterns in Augmented Reality-Based Physics Learning. (2026). Proceeding of IJC-MaSTEd (International Joint Conference on Mathematics, Science, Technology, and Education), 1(1), 114-121. https://doi.org/10.31571/ijcmasted.v1i1.1073